Information Sites etc. ie MySpace

AntiChristMofo · Post by **AntiChristMofo** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:39 pm

lol you would be suprized what a farmer with a pitch folk can shoot when need be i have seen 14 year old boys do it why cant they?

and also our troops fighting in india never got to the US and the troops from fighting the french were still in britian

and yes you did when but never the less you have to agree one 1 thing soon as you leave friendly soil your enemy has a greater chance of defeating you no matter the odds and by the time the war starte your troops have lived there alot long then the troops fighting in the french war

any good officer or commander will tell you never under estimate your opponent no matter what because when push comes to shove you would be suprized what you can do aswell

a bullet from a farmer is just as effective as a bullet from a trained soldier

Casas · Post by **Casas** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:48 pm

I didn't win. This happened over two century ago.

A bullet from a marksmen is better than a bullet from a farmer. Know how I know? The rifle. And Brittan has hordes of cannons at their disposal. In every sense of the word, defeat, Brittan was. But it's a good thing, someone had to end it's reign of imperial terror.

Took another century and a half for them to give up India.

Eddie Izzard is funny.

<Englishmen landing on shore> "I claim this land"
<Natives giving a puzzled look> "But we were here first"
<Englishman> "well do you have a flag?"
<Natives> "No"
<Englishman> "No flag, no country, those are the rules...I just made up, and I'm backing it up with this gun given to me by the NRA"

AntiChristMofo · Post by **AntiChristMofo** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:24 am

actualy a hllet from a farmer is just as effiective as a bullet from a soldier maybe more effective because it strikes humilation to the deffeat and the other thing is no matter who shoots that bullet the farmer or the soldier and it hits you you die all the same

and theres an old saying whatever goes up must come down

yes we reached our peak but i wouldnt of called it terror there was difference between then and know atleast britian didnt lie to the rest of the world and said they were going to stop terrorism they set out to conquor the world like hitler but less drastic its not like we wanted to kill of civilisation and turn it all bristish like hitler did trying to kill of all the jews even all the dgs except a certain breed

we have that same factor know the USA who has reached its peak it is a very powerful country but the way its going it wont be since it wants to start a war with the middle east Iran (Nuclear power) Afganistan (taliban) Iraq (rebels) hey it even tryed to change how Ira was run and americanise it same with the taliban they want the US to support there beleifs and change the way there country is personaly i think USA and the taliban is just a newer version of hitler

i just cant wait till bush leaves and tony blair then maybe we can get somone who is mature and can take some responibilty for there own actions istead of pionting the finger at somone else and firing them

Terpeh · Post by **Terpeh** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:49 pm

wasnt this a thread about info links and that kinda junk?

AntiChristMofo · Post by **AntiChristMofo** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:23 pm

lol torm you should know better then that we coundt keep o th same topic if our livies depened on it lol

Casas · Post by **Casas** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:07 pm

Uhmm British imperialism was evil. Just as evil as Belgium's. England did set out to change all cultures to an image it liked. Heard of India or Africa, or Falkan Islands? Or how about the Irish? Good lord, the whole mindset of England was they were rational beings, and Irish were savage primitives driven by their sexual urges. Believe Gulliver Swift wrote some nice tales about it.

Musekaze · Post by **Musekaze** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:23 pm

make a topic to discuss british imperialism then. stop spamming in threads not meant for talking about british imperialism. this was meant for people to see what we are like in real life.

and if you sit at a round table and talk with your buddies about british imperialism all teh time. then your a sad person.

AntiChristMofo · Post by **AntiChristMofo** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:37 pm

lol nothing wrong with history muse

and the birtish did not set out to change cultures they set out to conquor and learn knew stuff to keep them advanced civilation

Musekaze · Post by **Musekaze** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:48 pm

yes, but this isnt the thread for it.

btw torm made a hi5 acct and invited you

AntiChristMofo · Post by **AntiChristMofo** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:05 pm

lol i havnt used hi5 in yonks lol i will accept him lol

Terpeh · Post by **Terpeh** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:40 pm

yea i got the inite Muse now I need to add a comment after you settled down a bit

AntiChristMofo · Post by **AntiChristMofo** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:52 pm

settled down abit from doing what exactly??? lol

Casas · Post by **Casas** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:49 pm

Learn? Oh that's right.. Ghandi must of not liked how they were learning about Indian culture.. Oh yes, that's what all his civil disobedience was about. STOP LEARNING ABOUT OUR CULTURE!

British imperialism was evil, and in part, thanks to Hitler, it's over.

Terpeh · Post by **Terpeh** » Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:31 am

Casas spoke Maltese

Ghandi = i have (Aaa-ndi)

AntiChristMofo · Post by **AntiChristMofo** » Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:30 am

thanks to hitler

you mean thanks to the allie forces???